Section 2 of 3

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Criminal liability, regulatory fines, reputational damage, and career-ending consequences — the personal cost of failure.

Personal Criminal Liability

The most serious consequence of non-compliance is personal criminal prosecution under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. These are personal offences — they apply to the individual, not the firm.

Offence Section Maximum Penalty
Concealing, disguising, converting, or transferring criminal property s.327 POCA 14 years
Entering into arrangements facilitating ML s.328 POCA 14 years
Acquiring, using, or possessing criminal property s.329 POCA 14 years
Failure to disclose (regulated sector) s.330 POCA 5 years
Tipping off s.333A POCA 2 years
14 Years
maximum imprisonment — principal ML offences
5 Years
maximum — failure to disclose
2 Years
maximum — tipping off
Criminal consequences of money laundering

Regulatory Fines

Firms that fail to maintain adequate AML controls face substantial regulatory penalties. The FCA’s GBP 42 million fine against Barclays in 2025 — comprising GBP 39.3 million for the Stunt & Co failures and GBP 3.1 million for WealthTek — demonstrates that even the largest institutions are not immune.

GBP 42M
combined FCA fine — Barclays 2025
GBP 6.3M
ex-gratia payment to WealthTek clients

Reputational Damage

The reputational impact extends far beyond the fine itself. The Barclays enforcement received widespread media coverage and became a compliance training case study across the industry.

Customer Confidence

Loss of trust leads to customer attrition and difficulty attracting new business

Investor Impact

Share price pressure and increased cost of capital

Talent Retention

Difficulty attracting and retaining top compliance professionals

Regulatory Scrutiny

Heightened oversight, more frequent on-site visits, mandatory remediation

Business professionals - reputational impact

Employment & Professional Consequences

Employees who fail to comply with AML obligations face summary dismissal. AML failures are treated as gross misconduct. For individuals in regulated roles, consequences include:

FCA 2026 Direction

The FCA’s anticipated priorities for 2026 make the direction of travel clear:

FCA 2026 Approach

Material AML deficiencies will be treated as governance failings, potentially leading to personal action against individual Senior Managers under SM&CR. WilmerHale’s analysis confirms that financial crime remains a top enforcement priority with intensified scrutiny of both systems and individuals.

Knowledge Check

Answer all 5 questions to complete this section and unlock the final assessment.

Question 1 of 5
What is the maximum prison sentence for the principal money laundering offences under POCA (ss.327-329)?
Question 2 of 5
How has the FCA indicated it will treat material AML deficiencies from 2026 onwards?
Question 3 of 5
In the Barclays enforcement action, what was the total financial impact of the WealthTek case (fine + ex-gratia payment)?
Question 4 of 5
Which of the following is NOT a potential consequence of personal AML non-compliance?
Question 5 of 5
Under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR), who can be held personally accountable for AML failures?
questions answered correctly
All questions answered — Final Assessment unlocked!
Previous: Role-Specific Responsibilities Next: Course Summary & Final Assessment